Most-cited articles · 2019
The 10 most-cited articles in Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, 2019
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 201 eligible articles Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy published in 2019. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 3 citations: Bargaining for Adjuncts: An Assessment of Adjunct Union Growth in the Saint Louis Region.
- Cohort
- 201 articles
- Listed
- Top 10 (5.0%)
- Open access
- 10 of 10
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 0.5%
Bargaining for Adjuncts: An Assessment of Adjunct Union Growth in the Saint Louis Region
Jameson Ramirez
3 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1739OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Minimum-wage labor is no longer confined to sectors once associated with low-skill occupations. In college classrooms across the United States, we are witness to the rise of a “gig-economy” among faculty positions where highly skilled work is being completed by part-time workers known commonly as adjuncts. Despite performing highly-skilled work, adjuncts are compensated at the levels of low-skilled workers. Lack of access to benefits, capricious contract agreements, and a general sense of feeling dispensable are common themes to the adjunct experience. The aim of this paper is to address the concerns of adjuncts and suggest some workable solutions to their contingent situation. As a resident of the Midwest and member of the adjunct labor movement in this part of the country, my primary focus for discussion will be the Saint Louis region. I argue that the most effective way for adjuncts to address their precarious labor arrangements is to tap into the power of organized labor. Universities and colleges in the Saint Louis area have seen a dramatic surge in adjunct activism that has…
- 2top 1%
Panel: Peer-Based Faculty Evaluation v. Student Evaluation of Teaching
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1853OpenAlex
- 3top 1.5%
Panel: Racial and Economic Equity in Higher Education
Mark Huelsman
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1835OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Social Exclusion: The State of State U for Black Students
- 4top 2%
Panel: Peer-Based Faculty Evaluation v. Student Evaluation of Teaching
Leah M. Akins, Laura L. Murphy
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1852OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Research Questions:• What is the purpose of Student Surveys of Teaching?• Who are they for?• How are they delivered?• How is the data collected?• How and with whom is the data shared?• Are they effective measures of teaching?• What do they actually measure?• Why are they used so extensively?2
- 5top 2.5%
Panel: Racial and Economic Equity in Higher Education
Mark Huelsman
2 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.58188/1941-8043.1834OpenAlex
- 6top 3%
Salary Compression Among University Faculty: A Review and Case Study of Remediation and Prevention in a Collective Bargaining Environment
Brent M. Graves, Dale Kapla
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1741OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Salary compression has been an issue in higher education for almost four decades, during which a diverse literature on the topic has accumulated. Perhaps because of the absence of a compilation and review of this literature, administrations and collective bargaining agents commonly develop their own methods for identifying and rectifying salary compression on each campus. Most responses are short-term and do not prevent the problem from recurring. We review the literature concerning salary compression in higher education, then summarize our approach to correcting salary structure and preventing future compression.
- 7top 3.5%
University Adjudications of Sexual Assaults: A Lesson To Be Learned from Collective Bargaining Agreements
James Ottavio Castagnera
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1740OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
At one time, Title IX of the federal Higher Education Act was read only as requiring equal opportunity for female athletes in universities’ varsity sports programs. In 2011 the U.S. Department of Education announced a radically expanded reading of the law to include sexual misconduct. This has resulted in a proliferation of litigation against the universities. Since 2011, more than 150 lawsuits have been filed against colleges and universities involving claims of due-process violations during the course of Title IX investigations and proceedings related to sexual assault allegations. In the two decades preceding that year, only 15 such lawsuits were filed against universities.
- 8top 4%
Panel: We Need More Chairs! Expanding Seats at Higher Education Bargaining Tables and For Our Broader Communities: Bargaining for the Common Good in Higher Education
Marilyn Sneiderman
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1809OpenAlex
- 9top 4.5%
Panel: The Adjunct Faculty Experience: Is What We "Know" Correct?
Paul Yakoboski
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1846OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Adjunct faculty: Who they are and what is their experience?
- 10top 5%
Research Panel: Variation in Women Attaining Full Professorships at Research Universities and Non-Tenured Faculty Systems in the US and Abroad
Sandra Darkey
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1857OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Structural/Organizational Determinants of Variations in Women Attaining the Full Professorship at Research Universities
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy with publication year 2019, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 7 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.