Most-cited articles · 2016
The 50 most-cited articles in Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, 2016
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 441 eligible articles Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy published in 2016. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 3 citations: The New Focus of Academic Organizing: Private Institutions Now Face Academic Collective Bargaining.
- Cohort
- 441 articles
- Listed
- Top 50 (11.3%)
- Open access
- 50 of 50
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
The most-cited articles in this 2016 collection cluster around academic labor organizing, faculty pay, and contingent or non-tenure-track appointments. The top paper, by Nicholas DiGiovanni, on private institutions facing academic collective bargaining, has three citations, as does the study by Charles S. Wassell, David W. Hedrick, Steven E. Henson and others on wage distribution impacts of higher education faculty unionization. A panel on Brown University and graduate student employee unionization follows with two citations, alongside work on post-doctorates and part-time faculty.
The list offers a snapshot of the questions that drew scholarly attention in this journal that year, including unionization at private universities, compensation, and the status of contingent and postdoctoral workers. Citation counts are drawn from OpenAlex and reflect the ranking of these articles among 441 eligible pieces.
Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 0.3%
The New Focus of Academic Organizing: Private Institutions Now Face Academic Collective Bargaining
Nicholas DiGiovanni
3 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1559OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Academic labor unions will likely become a growing presence on the campuses of private colleges and universities in the years ahead due to three main factors. First, the NLRB has agreed to hear a case involving a petition by the United Auto Workers to represent graduate teaching assistants at The New School, and it is quite likely that the NLRB will reverse past precedent and find that graduate teaching and research assistants will have the right to unionize at private institutions. Second, the Board also issued a highly consequential decision in December of 2014 which will make it exceedingly difficult for colleges and universities to establish that their faculty are collectively managerial employees and therefore without the right to unionize. This decision will open the door to the unionization of many full time contingent faculty and possibly tenure track/tenured faculty themselves. Finally, and perhaps of greatest immediacy, a growing and sprawling movement to organize adjunct and part-time faculty throughout the country has already brought academic collective bargaining to…
- 2top 0.5%
Wage Distribution Impacts of Higher Education Faculty Unionization
Charles S. Wassell, David W. Hedrick, Steven E. Henson, John M. Krieg
3 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1368OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The literature on the effects of unions on the distribution of wages at the macroeconomic and inter-industry levels has given little attention to the effects at the firm level. At the same time, research on collective bargaining impacts in higher education has focused on the overall wage level rather than on the distribution of salaries. Using panel data on individual faculty members, we find faculty unionization to be associated with a significant flattening of the wage distribution across academic disciplines. This has implications for why faculty might choose to unionize, even in the absence of an overall wage premium.
- 3top 0.7%
Panel: Brown University Redux - Effects of Unionization on Graduate Student Employees: Faculty-Student Relations, Academic Freedom, and Pay
Sean Edmund Rogers, Adrienne E. Eaton, Paula Beth Vogel Voos
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1636OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
In cases involving unionization of graduate student research and teaching assistants at private U.S. universities, the National Labor Relations Board has, at times, denied collective bargaining rights on the presumption that unionization would harm faculty--student relations and academic freedom. Using survey data collected from PhD students in five academic disciplines across eight public U.S. universities, the authors compare represented and non-represented graduate student employees in terms of faculty--student relations, academic freedom, and pay. Unionization does not have the presumed negative effect on student outcomes, and in some cases has a positive effect. Union-represented graduate student employees report higher levels of personal and professional support, unionized graduate student employees fare better on pay, and unionized and nonunionized students report similar perceptions of academic freedom. These findings suggest that potential harm to faculty--student relationships and academic freedom should not continue to serve as bases for the denial of collective…
- 4top 1%
Panel: Collective Bargaining Issues Concerning Post-Doctorates
Sayil Camacho, Jerome J. Kukor, Amy Lee, Karen Esther Rosenberg
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1643OpenAlex
- 5top 1.2%
Part-Time Faculty: Semantics and the Meaning of Contingent Teaching
Margaret E. Winters
2 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1555OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The variety of titles for non-tenure-track, part-time, contingent faculty and their semantic meanings are explored. The terms are not random when looked at collectively, but rather form a pattern which is indicative of contemporary post-secondary academic employment and culture. More specifically, these titles reflect several characteristics of the faculty who bear them: among others, the fact that they are not in full-time employment, the fact that their contracts are for shorter periods of time than those of tenure-track faculty, and the fact that their contracts reflect an expectation of impermanence in employment. Also expressed in the titles are more nuanced attitudes about these non-tenure-track faculty, how they serve the colleges and universities where they work, what expectations there are for them as employees, and how they are viewed by their colleagues and the administration. Finally, changes in these titles over time point to changing attitudes and, occasionally, the effect of unionization with its collective bargaining agreements on the status of these employees.
- 6top 1.4%
Panel: Collective Bargaining Issues Concerning Post-Doctorates
Karen Esther Rosenberg
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1628OpenAlex
- 7top 1.6%
Panel: Dual Credit and Enrollment Issues at Community Colleges
Alec Thomson
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1634OpenAlex
- 8top 1.9%
Workshop: Microaggressionsand Implicit Bias on Campus - Microaggressions and Disability
Barbara Diamond
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1637OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The Religious Model Disability is a punishment for spiritual flaws of oneself or one's family.Disabled people are morally flawed and should be shunned/avoided.Disability is stigmatized.
- 9top 2.1%
Panel: Dual Credit and Enrollment Issues at Community Colleges - A Case Study: Erie Community College
Kristin Klein Wheaton
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1635OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
2) High school students attend college classes on one of ECC's three campuses 3) ECC authorizes a high school teacher to provide college credit bearing coursework to students in the high school 6
- 10top 2.3%
- 11top 2.5%
Panel: Discrimination and Harassment Issues in Higher Education - Law and Litigation
Merrick T. Rossein
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1621OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
KeyCiteL:Cases and other legal materials listed in KeyCite Scope can be researched through the KeyCite
- 12top 2.8%
Panel: Transforming the Collective Bargaining Process at Florida Gulf Coast University
Elizabeth Elliott
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1625OpenAlex
- 13top 3%
Panel: Future of Community Colleges - College Promise Campaign
Martha J. Kanter
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1578OpenAlex
- 14top 3.2%
Panel: The Fair Labor Standards act and Professional Employment on Campus
John Ho
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1593OpenAlex
- 15top 3.5%
Workshop: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations Training for New Administrators and New Union Representatives - Introduction to Collective Bargaining
Conrad Bowling
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1641OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Fundamentals of Collective BargainingCollective bargaining is an economically rational behavior engaged in by two competing interest: employers and labor unions.Settlement between the two parties is reached at an equilibrium point at which both employer and employee perceive that they will be better off if they agree than if they do not.In the case of college faculty bargaining, the union's major goals are improved financial compensation, job security, and reduced work loads.Institutions of higher education, however, seek to conserve their scarce resources in order to maximize productivity, particularly in regard to institutional quality.(
- 16top 3.7%
Workshop: Improving Communication Skills for the Bargaining Table
Michael Shay
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1583OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Listening for "why" The critical communication skill Positioning discussions to solve
- 17top 3.9%
Panel: State of Public Pensions and Its Impact on Collective Bargaining
Elliot Susseles
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1617OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Plan changes to reduce costs and risks Multiple accounting and reporting rules-GASB, Moody'
- 18top 4.1%
Research Panel: Monetary Compensation of Faculty at America’s Public Regional Universities: Does Collective Bargaining Matter?: A Comment
Frederick G. Floss
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1567OpenAlex
- 19top 4.4%
Panel: Negotiating Over Job Security for Contingent Faculty - The Three Legged Stool
Judi Burgess
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1642OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The Three-Legged Stool How SEIU Local 500 collective bargaining agreements are improving job security for part-time faculty.
- 20top 4.6%
Panel: Collective Bargaining Issues Concerning Post-Doctorates - Breaking the Silence: The Unionization of Post-Doctorate Workers at the University of California
Sayil Camacho, Robert A. Rhoads
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1629OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
This article examines the postdoctoral unionization movement at the University of California (UC) using case study methodology.More specifically, we examine postdoctoral union organizers involved in the United Automobile Workers of America (UAW) Local 5810, focusing on their efforts to unionize postdoctoral employees at the UC.The study is situated within the broader context of neoliberal influences and the corporatization of the contemporary U.S. research university.The case of the UC postdoc union movement is seen as particularly important given that approximately 1/10th of all U.S. university postdoctoral workers are employed at the UC and the quest to meet UC's postdoctoral research needs is increasingly global in nature.Accordingly, we rely on two primary sources of data: the collection and analysis of key documents and semistructured interviews with postdoctoral union organizers.The findings focus on three key issues: 1) conditions of workplace vulnerability; 2) challenges of organizing a postdoctoral union and negotiating a contract; and 3) outcomes of the unionization…
- 21top 4.8%
Panel: Higher Education Issues at Public sector Labor Boards
Majorie Wittner
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1569OpenAlex
- 22top 5%
Panel: Graduate Assistants, Unionization, and Negotiations - The UConn Perspective
Michael Eagen
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1582OpenAlex
- 23top 5.3%
Panel: Career Technical Education for the Future - Career Tech Education: A Union View of the CCC Board’s Task Force Report
Mark Smith
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1614OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Outline of Approach• I am discussing the Report of the Board of Governors' Task Force on Workforce, Job Creation, and a Strong Economy as a policy document from the perspective of a national union analyst of higher education.• I am not speaking for NEA's state affiliate, the California Teachers' Association, nor am I speaking for any local that is bargaining over the implications of this report.
- 24top 5.5%
Panel: Higher Education Issues at Public sector Labor Boards
Adam Rhynard
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1570OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
In 1999, the Union petitioned to represent all Graduate Assistants at the University.• Citing a 1977 ERB decision, the University objected to the petition on the ground that GAs who were teaching or performing research primarily to fulfill a degree requirement were not public employees.• Ultimately, after a consent election agreement, the ERB certified a bargaining unit of GAs that excluded those who taught or performed research primarily to fulfill a degree requirement.• In 2012, the Union filed this petition to add those previously-excluded GAs (767) to the existing bargaining unit (951).
- 25top 5.7%
Panel: Affordable Care Act Update
John Abraham
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1640OpenAlex
- 26top 5.9%
Workshop: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations Training for New Administrators and New Union Representatives - Academic Leadership for Union Leaders and Administrators) in a Unionized Environment
Susan Pearson
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1611OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
PATIENCE• Patience may or may not be a virtue, but it is essential to CB. CB is a process, it's a lengthy process, and it will not end, no matter how badly you want it to, until everyone feels they have been fully heard and had
- 27top 6.2%
Negotiating over Job Security for contingent Faculty: the CFA experience
Jonathan Karpf
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1577OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Acrimonious relations between the two camps • A very close election in 1981 led to a runoff, as only 49 votes out of 15,000 cast separated the two • Run-off in July 1982 even closer, only 12 votes difference 9 Karpf: Negotiating over Job Security for contingent Faculty: the CFA exp
- 28top 6.4%
Workshop: Data Analysis for Use During Collective Bargaining
Michael Nadol
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1608OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Which CPI?• CPI-U: All Urban Consumers -Excludes rural, nonmetropolitan areas, farm families, persons in the ArmedServices, and those in institutions (e.g., prisons, mental hospitals)-Captures substitution across item categories by adjusting for shifts in consumer expenditure patterns; BLS "closest approximation" to true cost of living -National only; historical since 12/99; data lags ("initial" then "interim" for two years)• CPI-W: Wage and Clerical Workers -More than half of household income from hourly clerical or wage occupations and at least one household member employed 37 weeks of last 12 months -Excludes retirees, self-employed, unemployed, professional, managerial, and technical workers, etc.
- 29top 6.6%
Panel Handout: Faculty as Mandatory Reporters under Title IX - FAQs on Title IX and Sexual Violence
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1584OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
idioma inglés, puede, sin costo alguno, solicitar asistencia lingüística con respecto a esta información llamando al 1-800-USA-LEARN (1-800-872-5327) (TTY: 1-800-877-8339), o envíe un mensaje de correo electrónico a: Ed.
- 30top 6.9%
Panel Handout: Fair Labor Standards Act and Professional Employment on Campus - Federal Register Vol. 80 No. 128
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1596OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act) guarantees a minimum wage and overtime pay at a rate of not less than one and one-half times the employee's regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek.While these protections extend to most workers, the FLSA does provide a number of exemptions.The Department of Labor (Department) proposes to update and revise the regulations issued under the FLSA implementing the exemption from minimum wage and overtime pay for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees.This exemption is referred to as the FLSA's ''EAP'' or ''white collar'' exemption.To be considered exempt, employees must meet certain minimum tests related to their primary job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than a specified minimum amount.The standard salary level required for exemption is currently $455 a week ($23,660 for a full-year worker) and was last updated in 2004.By way of this rulemaking, the Department seeks to update the salary level to ensure that the FLSA's intended overtime protections are fully implemented, and…
- 31top 7.1%
Panel Handout: MICA: Negotiating a First Contingent Faculty Contract at an Art School
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1610OpenAlex
- 32top 7.3%
Panel Handout: Collective Bargaining at Academic Medical Centers - University of Connecticut Health Center
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1618OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
time or who work a fulltime equivalent equal to or greater than twenty percent (0.2 FTE) and who are not excluded in the following paragraph, for the purpose of negotiating with respect to wages, hours and other conditions of employment.Hereinafter
- 33top 7.5%
Panel Handout: Collective Bargaining at Academic Medical Centers - CBA University of Medicine and Dentistry in NJ and NJEA
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1619OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The University recognizes the Association as the exclusive negotiating agent for all full-time teaching and/or research faculty and all part-time teaching and/or research faculty who are employed at 50% or more of full-time at the UMDNJ-School of Health Related Professions, but specifically excluding all faculty members who are employed by the University at less than 50% of full-time, all faculty members who in addition to their professorial titles hold any title which carries managerial, administrative, or supervisory responsibility
- 34top 7.8%
Research Panel: Monetary Compensation of Full-Time Faculty at American Public Regional Universities: The Impact of Geography and the Existence of Collective Bargaining
Stephen G. Katsinas, Johnson A Ogun, Nathaniel J. Bray
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1566OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
This work builds upon an analysis of regional universities that began in 2009, to build a geographically-based, quantifiable definition of the nation's regional universities. It builds on efforts begun by Katsinas (1993) to geographically map access oriented community colleges, which resulted in the geographic coding of Associate's Colleges as part of the 2005 and 2010 Basic Classification of Institutions of Higher Education published by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Katsinas, Lacey, & Hardy, 2005). Key findings 1. Wide variation in salaries and fringe benefits based upon geographic region served. 2. Wide variation in salaries and fringe benefits based if collective bargaining exists. 3. Access institutions need a 21st century classification scheme to reflect mission, workload
- 35top 8%
- 36top 8.2%
Panel Handout: Career Technical Education for the Future - CA Community Colleges: Task Force on Workforce, Job Creation, and a Strong Economy
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1615OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
California Community Colleges lead the state and nation in providing postsecondary career technical education (CTE) and training.Serving more than 2.1 million students, the 113 community colleges provide workforce training, basic skills education, and transfer preparation.Students can enroll in associate degree and certificate programs in 350 fields of study.The colleges also offer apprenticeship programs, short-term training aligned to thirdparty credentials, and incumbent worker training to upgrade skill sets in various industry sectors.Employers currently struggle to find workers who possess the necessary skills to fill job openings, and this skills gap is projected to grow.By 2025, 30 percent of all job openings in California -or a total of 1.9 million jobs -will require some form of postsecondary education short of a four-year degree.California's education pipeline is not keeping pace with the higher levels of skills and education required by employers and must significantly increase the number of individuals with industry-valued, middle-skill degrees, certificates and…
- 37top 8.4%
Panel Handout: Faculty as Mandatory Reporters under Title IX - Sexual Violence Letter
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1585OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Education has long been recognized as the great equalizer in America.The U.S. Department of Education and its Office for Civil Rights (OCR) believe that providing all students with an educational environment free from discrimination is extremely important.The sexual harassment of students, including sexual violence, interferes with students' right to receive an education free from discrimination and, in the case of sexual violence, is a crime.Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), 20 U.S.C. § § 1681 et seq., and its implementing regulations, 34 C.F.R. Part 106, prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities operated by recipients of Federal financial assistance.Sexual harassment of students, which includes acts of sexual violence, is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title IX.In order to assist recipients, which include school districts, colleges, and universities (hereinafter "schools" or "recipients") in meeting these obligations, this letter 1 explains that the requirements of Title IX pertaining to sexual harassment…
- 38top 8.7%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - Brown University NLRB Decision on Review and Order
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1603OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
the Regional Director for Region 1 issued a Decision and Direction of Election in which she applied New York University, 332 NLRB 1205 (2000) (NYU), to find that teaching assistants, research assistants, and proctors are employees within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Act and constitute an appropriate unit for collective bargaining.Thereafter, in accordance with Section 102.67 of the Board's Rules and Regulations, Brown University (Brown) filed a timely request for review, urging the Board, inter alia, to reconsider NYU.The Petitioner filed an opposition.On March 22, 2002, the Board granted the request for review.Brown and the Petitioner filed briefs on review.Amicus curiae briefs also were filed. 1 The case presents the issue of whether graduate student assistants who are admitted into, not hired by, a university, and for whom supervised teaching or research is an integral component of their academic development, must be treated as employees for purposes of collective bargaining under Section 2(3) of the Act.The Board in NYU concluded that graduate student assistants are…
- 39top 8.9%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - Brief of Amicus Curiae Columbia University
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1599OpenAlex
- 40top 9.1%
Panel Handout: Future of Community Colleges - College Promise Campaign
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1579OpenAlex
- 41top 9.3%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - NLRB Notice and Invitation to File Briefs
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1601OpenAlex
- 42top 9.6%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - New York University NLRB Order (2010)
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1605OpenAlex
- 43top 9.8%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - Brief of Amicus Curiae AFL-CIO
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1598OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
excluding graduate assistants from the Act's broad definition of "employee" was flawed and unsupported.Therefore, the Board should overrule Brown and return to its understanding that, where "the fulfillment of the duties of a graduate assistant requires performance of work, controlled by the Employer,
- 44top 10%
Panel Handout: Brown University Redux - Supplemental Decision by NLRB Regional Director
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1602OpenAlex
- 45top 10.3%
Panel Handout: Collective Bargaining Issues Concerning Post-Doctorates - Rutgers and AAUP Post-Doc CBA
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1630OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
In the application of provisions of this Agreement or University regulations and policies affecting terms and conditions of employment, there shall be no unlawful discrimination by the University or the AAUP-AFT against any member of the bargaining unit because of race, creed, color, sex, religion, national origin, ancestry, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, familial status, age, autism spectrum disorder, disability or atypical hereditary cellular or blood trait, genetic information, refusal to submit to a genetic test or make available the results of a genetic test, veteran status, affectional or sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or membership or non-membership in or activity on behalf of or in opposition to the Union.These terms shall have the meaning as defined by the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) as of the date of the alleged act of discrimination.'.
- 46top 10.5%
An Analytical Review of Higher Education Unionism Over the Last 40 Plus Years As a Union Staff Person
Mark Chaykin
1 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1560OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
An analytical review of an observer and participant in the changes that have occurred on the campuses of both public and private (independent) universities and colleges with regard to the unionization of faculty, non-teaching professionals, support staff, and adjuncts.
- 47top 10.7%
Panel: Multi-Employer Negotiations in Higher Education
Laura Burke-O'Flynn
0 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1606OpenAlex
- 48top 10.9%
Panel Handout: Microaggressions and Implicit Bias on Campus - Implicit Bias: A Selected Biography 2016
Barbara Diamond
0 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1638OpenAlex
- 49top 11.2%
Panel: Discrimination and Harassment Issues in Higher Education - Recent Tenure Discrimination Federal Court Decisions
Merrick T. Rossein
0 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1622OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Plaintiff, an Asian male (native of South Korea) was denied tenure at a state university and brought suit claiming racial discrimination.The Fifth Circuit noted:University tenure decisions represent a distinct kind of employment action, involving special considerations.In order to establish a prima facie case in the context of a denial of tenure, the plaintiff must show that: (1) he belongs to a protected group, (2) he was qualified for tenure, and (3) he was denied tenure in circumstances permitting an inference of discrimination.Evidence that supports a prima facie case includes departures from university procedures, conventional evidence of bias against he plaintiff, and evidence that the plaintiff is found to be qualified for tenure by some significant portion of the department faculty, reference, or other scholars in the particular field.Id. at 265.
- 50top 11.4%
Panel Handout: Microaggressions and Implicit Bias on Campus - Microaggression Theory: A Selected Bibliography 2016
Barbara Diamond
0 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.58188/1941-8043.1639OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
reluctance of Whites to label ambiguous events as discriminatory)
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy with publication year 2016, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 50 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 30 of the 50 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 25 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.