Most-cited articles · 2020

The 10 most-cited articles in Journal of Marketing, 2020

Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 61 eligible articles Journal of Marketing published in 2020. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 1,239 citations: Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective.

Cohort
61 articles
Listed
Top 10 (16.4%)
Open access
4 of 10
Snapshot
2026-10-29

Ask about these papers

Grounded in this list only, with sources.

3 of 3 free questions left today, no account needed
  1. 1
    top 1.7%

    Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective

    Stefano Puntoni, Rebecca Walker Reczek, Markus Giesler, Simona Botti

    1,239 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1177/0022242920953847OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Artificial intelligence (AI) helps companies offer important benefits to consumers, such as health monitoring with wearable devices, advice with recommender systems, peace of mind with smart household products, and convenience with voice-activated virtual assistants. However, although AI can be seen as a neutral tool to be evaluated on efficiency and accuracy, this approach does not consider the social and individual challenges that can occur when AI is deployed. This research aims to bridge these two perspectives: on one side, the authors acknowledge the value that embedding AI technology into products and services can provide to consumers. On the other side, the authors build on and integrate sociological and psychological scholarship to examine some of the costs consumers experience in their interactions with AI. In doing so, the authors identify four types of consumer experiences with AI: (1) data capture, (2) classification, (3) delegation, and (4) social. This approach allows the authors to discuss policy and managerial avenues to address the ways in which consumers may fail…

  2. 2
    top 3.3%

    Artificial Intelligence in Utilitarian vs. Hedonic Contexts: The “Word-of-Machine” Effect

    Chiara Longoni, Luca Cian

    828 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242920957347OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Rapid development and adoption of AI, machine learning, and natural language processing applications challenge managers and policy makers to harness these transformative technologies. In this context, the authors provide evidence of a novel “word-of-machine” effect, the phenomenon by which utilitarian/hedonic attribute trade-offs determine preference for, or resistance to, AI-based recommendations compared with traditional word of mouth, or human-based recommendations. The word-of-machine effect stems from a lay belief that AI recommenders are more competent than human recommenders in the utilitarian realm and less competent than human recommenders in the hedonic realm. As a consequence, importance or salience of utilitarian attributes determine preference for AI recommenders over human ones, and importance or salience of hedonic attributes determine resistance to AI recommenders over human ones (Studies 1–4). The word-of machine effect is robust to attribute complexity, number of options considered, and transaction costs. The word-of-machine effect reverses for utilitarian goals if…

  3. 3
    top 5%

    Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value

    Yashoda Bhagwat, Nooshin L. Warren, Joshua T. Beck, George F. Watson

    476 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242920937000OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Stakeholders have long pressured firms to provide societal benefits in addition to generating shareholder wealth. Such benefits have traditionally come in the form of corporate social responsibility. However, many stakeholders now expect firms to demonstrate their values by expressing public support for or opposition to one side of a partisan sociopolitical issue, a phenomenon the authors call “corporate sociopolitical activism” (CSA). Such activities differ from commonly favored corporate social responsibility and have the potential to both strengthen and sever stakeholder relationships, thus making their impact on firm value uncertain. Using signaling and screening theories, the authors analyze 293 CSA events initiated by 149 firms across 39 industries, and find that, on average, CSA elicits an adverse reaction from investors. Investors evaluate CSA as a signal of a firm’s allocation of resources away from profit-oriented objectives and toward a risky activity with uncertain outcomes. The authors further identify two sets of moderators: (1) CSA’s deviation from key stakeholders’…

  4. 4
    top 6.6%

    Branding in a Hyperconnected World: Refocusing Theories and Rethinking Boundaries

    Vanitha Swaminathan, Alina B. Sorescu, Jan‐Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, Thomas C. O’Guinn, Bernd H. Schmitt

    456 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242919899905OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Technological advances have resulted in a hyperconnected world, requiring a reassessment of branding research from the perspectives of firms, consumers, and society. Brands are shifting away from single ownership to shared ownership, as heightened access to information and people is allowing more stakeholders to cocreate brand meanings and experiences alongside traditional brand owners and managers. Moreover, hyperconnectivity has allowed existing brands to expand their geographic reach and societal roles, while new types of branded entities (ideas, people, places, and organizational brands) are further stretching the branding space. To help establish a new branding paradigm that accounts for these changes, the authors address the following questions: (1) What are the roles and functions of brands?, (2) How is brand value (co)created?, and (3) How should brands be managed? Throughout the article, the authors also identify future research issues that require scholarly attention, with the aim of aligning branding theory and practice with the realities of a hyperconnected world.

  5. 5
    top 8.2%

    Evolution of Consumption: A Psychological Ownership Framework

    Carey K. Morewedge, Ashwani Monga, Robert W. Palmatier, Suzanne B. Shu, Deborah A. Small

    337 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1177/0022242920957007OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Technological innovations are creating new products, services, and markets that satisfy enduring consumer needs. These technological innovations create value for consumers and firms in many ways, but they also disrupt psychological ownership––the feeling that a thing is “MINE.” The authors describe two key dimensions of this technology-driven evolution of consumption pertaining to psychological ownership: (1) replacing legal ownership of private goods with legal access rights to goods and services owned and used by others and (2) replacing “solid” material goods with “liquid” experiential goods. They propose that these consumption changes can have three effects on psychological ownership: they can threaten it, cause it to transfer to other targets, and create new opportunities to preserve it. These changes and their effects are organized in a framework and examined across three macro trends in marketing: (1) growth of the sharing economy, (2) digitization of goods and services, and (3) expansion of personal data. This psychological ownership framework generates future research…

  6. 6
    top 9.9%

    Artificial Intelligence Coaches for Sales Agents: Caveats and Solutions

    Xueming Luo, Marco Shaojun Qin, Zheng Fang, Zhe Qu

    335 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242920956676OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Firms are exploiting artificial intelligence (AI) coaches to provide training to sales agents and improve their job skills. The authors present several caveats associated with such practices based on a series of randomized field experiments. Experiment 1 shows that the incremental benefit of the AI coach over human managers is heterogeneous across agents in an inverted-U shape: whereas middle-ranked agents improve their performance by the largest amount, both bottom- and top-ranked agents show limited incremental gains. This pattern is driven by a learning-based mechanism in which bottom-ranked agents encounter the most severe information overload problem with the AI versus human coach, while top-ranked agents hold the strongest aversion to the AI relative to a human coach. To alleviate the challenge faced by bottom-ranked agents, Experiment 2 redesigns the AI coach by restricting the training feedback level and shows a significant improvement in agent performance. Experiment 3 reveals that the AI–human coach assemblage outperforms either the AI or human coach alone. This assemblage…

  7. 7
    top 11.5%

    Marketing Agility: The Concept, Antecedents, and a Research Agenda

    Kartik Kalaignanam, Kapil R. Tuli, Tarun Kushwaha, Leonard Lee, David Gal

    319 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1177/0022242920952760OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Changes in the way customers shop, accompanied by an explosion of customer touchpoints and fast-changing competitive and technological dynamics, have led to an increased emphasis on agile marketing. The objective of this article is to conceptualize and investigate the emerging concept of marketing agility. The authors synthesize the literature from marketing and allied disciplines and insights from in-depth interviews with 22 senior managers. Marketing agility is defined as the extent to which an entity rapidly iterates between making sense of the market and executing marketing decisions to adapt to the market. It is conceptualized as occurring across different organizational levels and shown to be distinct from related concepts in marketing and allied fields. The authors highlight the firm challenges in executing marketing agility, including ensuring brand consistency, scaling agility across the marketing ecosystem, managing data privacy concerns, pursuing marketing agility as a fad, and hiring marketing leaders. The authors identify the antecedents of marketing agility at the…

  8. 8
    top 13.2%

    Traveling with Companions: The Social Customer Journey

    Ryan Hamilton, Rosellina Ferraro, Kelly L. Haws, Anirban Mukhopadhyay

    297 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242920908227OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    When customers journey from a need to a purchase decision and beyond, they rarely do so alone. This article introduces the social customer journey, which extends prior perspectives on the path to purchase by explicitly integrating the important role that social others play throughout the journey. The authors highlight the importance of “traveling companions,” who interact with the decision maker through one or more phases of the journey, and they argue that the social distance between the companion(s) and the decision maker is an important factor in how social influence affects that journey. They also consider customer journeys made by decision-making units consisting of multiple individuals and increasingly including artificial intelligence agents that can serve as surrogates for social others. The social customer journey concept integrates prior findings on social influences and customer journeys and highlights opportunities for new research within and across the various stages. Finally, the authors discuss several actionable marketing implications relevant to organizations’…

  9. 9
    top 14.8%

    Caring for the Commons: Using Psychological Ownership to Enhance Stewardship Behavior for Public Goods

    Joann Peck, Colleen P. Kirk, Andrea Webb Luangrath, Suzanne B. Shu

    251 citationsdoi:10.1177/0022242920952084OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    How can consumers be encouraged to take better care of public goods? Across four studies, including two experiments in the field and three documenting actual behaviors, the authors demonstrate that increasing consumers’ individual psychological ownership facilitates stewardship of public goods. This effect occurs because feelings of ownership increase consumers’ perceived responsibility, which then leads to active behavior to care for the good. Evidence from a variety of contexts, including a public lake with kayakers, a state park with skiers, and a public walking path, suggests that increasing psychological ownership enhances both effortful stewardship, such as picking up trash from a lake, and financial stewardship, such as donating money. This work further demonstrates that the relationship between psychological ownership and resulting stewardship behavior is attenuated when there are cues, such as an attendance sign, which diffuse responsibility among many people. This work offers implications for consumers, practitioners, and policy makers with simple interventions that can…

  10. 10
    top 16.4%

    Customer Experience Journeys: Loyalty Loops Versus Involvement Spirals

    Anton Siebert, Ahir Gopaldas, Andrew M. Lindridge, Cláudia Simões

    242 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1177/0022242920920262OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Customer experience management research is increasingly concerned with the long-term evolution of customer experience journeys across multiple service cycles. A dominant smooth journey model makes customers’ lives easier, with a cyclical pattern of predictable experiences that builds customer loyalty over time, also known as a loyalty loop. An alternate sticky journey model makes customers’ lives exciting, with a cyclical pattern of unpredictable experiences that increases customer involvement over time, conceptualized here as an involvement spiral. Whereas the smooth journey model is ideal for instrumental services that facilitate jobs to be done, the sticky journey model is ideal for recreational services that facilitate never-ending adventures. To match the flow of each journey type, firms are advised to encourage purchases during the initial service cycles of smooth journeys, or subsequent service cycles of sticky journeys. In multiservice systems, firms can sustain customer journeys by interlinking loyalty loops and involvement spirals. The article concludes with new…

How to read this list

The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Journal of Marketing with publication year 2020, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.

Other journals, same idea

Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi

  • The papers land in your library with their DOIs
  • Ask anything across all of them, with citations
  • Draft a literature review from the same sources

Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.

Reading several of these?

Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.