Most-cited articles · 2023
The 10 most-cited articles in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2023
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 100 eligible articles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published in 2023. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 278 citations: Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures..
- Cohort
- 100 articles
- Listed
- Top 10 (10.0%)
- Open access
- 5 of 10
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
The most-cited articles from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2023 cluster around culture, measurement, and social relationships. The top paper, "Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures" by Atari, Haidt, Graham and colleagues, received 278 citations. Other highly cited works examine narcissism across eight measures and over 250,000 participants, and patterns of independence and interdependence in Mediterranean societies.
Readers can use this list to see which topics and methods drew the most citation attention in the journal that year. The ranking reflects citation counts from OpenAlex among 100 eligible articles, so it offers a snapshot of influence rather than a judgment of quality.
Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 1%
Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.
Mohammad Atari, Jonathan Haidt, Jesse Graham, Spassena P. Koleva, Sean T. Stevens and 1 more
278 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000470OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
= 1,410, three populations) provided evidence for convergent validity of the MFQ-2 scores, expanded the nomological network of the six moral foundations, and demonstrated the improved predictive power of the measure compared with the original MFQ. Importantly, our results showed how the nomological network of moral foundations varied across cultural contexts: consistent with a pluralistic view of morality, different foundations were influential in the network of moral foundations depending on cultural context. These studies sharpen the theoretical and methodological resolution of moral foundations theory and provide the field of moral psychology a more accurate instrument for investigating the many ways that moral conflicts and divisions are shaping the modern world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
- 2top 2%
Age and gender differences in narcissism: A comprehensive study across eight measures and over 250,000 participants.
Rebekka Weidmann, William J. Chopik, Robert A. Ackerman, Marc Allroggen, Emily C. Bianchi and 22 more
102 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000463OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
, Version IV, Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire-Short Form, Single-Item Narcissism Scale, and brief version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory). The findings of Study 1 (N = 5,736) revealed heterogeneity in how strongly the measures are correlated. Some instruments loaded clearly on one of the three factors proposed by previous research (i.e., Neuroticism, Extraversion, Antagonism), while others cross-loaded across factors and in distinct ways. Cross-sectional analyses using each measure and meta-analytic results across all measures (Study 2) with a total sample of 270,029 participants suggest consistent linear age effects (random effects meta-analytic effect of r = -.104), with narcissism being highest in young adulthood. Consistent gender differences also emerged (random effects meta-analytic effect was -.079), such that men scored higher in narcissism than women. Quadratic age effects and Age × Gender effects were generally very small and inconsistent. We conclude that despite the various conceptualizations of narcissism, age and gender differences are…
- 3top 3%
Neither Eastern nor Western: Patterns of independence and interdependence in Mediterranean societies.
Ayşe K. Üskül, Alexander Kirchner‐Häusler, Vivian L. Vignoles, Rosa Rodríguez‐Bailón, Vanessa A. Castillo and 19 more
87 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1037/pspa0000342OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Social science research has highlighted "honor" as a central value driving social behavior in Mediterranean societies, which requires individuals to develop and protect a sense of their personal self-worth and their social reputation, through assertiveness, competitiveness, and retaliation in the face of threats. We predicted that members of Mediterranean societies may exhibit a distinctive combination of independent and interdependent social orientation, self-construal, and cognitive style, compared to more commonly studied East Asian and Anglo-Western cultural groups. We compared participants from eight Mediterranean societies (Spain, Italy, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus [Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot communities], Lebanon, Egypt) to participants from East Asian (Korea, Japan) and Anglo-Western (the United Kingdom, the United States) societies, using six implicit social orientation indicators, an eight-dimensional self-construal scale, and four cognitive style indicators. Compared with both East Asian and Anglo-Western samples, samples from Mediterranean societies distinctively…
- 4top 4%
“Mostly White, heterosexual couples”: Examining demographic diversity and reporting practices in relationship science research samples.
Emma Laurel McGorray, Lydia F. Emery, Alexandra Garr‐Schultz, Eli J. Finkel
85 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspi0000417OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
, a major subfield of social-personality psychology, illustrating both the unique diversity-relevant challenges faced by particular subfields and the barriers to inclusive and diverse research that are shared across research areas. Specifically, we examine the sample diversity and reporting practices of 1,762 studies published in eight mainstream psychology and relationships journals at two time points-(a) 1996-2000 and (b) 2016-2020-and center our analysis around five focal sample characteristics: gender, sexual orientation, regional context, socioeconomic status (SES), and race. We find that reporting practices and representation have not improved for some core demographic characteristics (e.g., socioeconomic status) and that even in domains for which reporting practices have improved (e.g., sexual orientation), reporting remains limited. Further, we find that reporting practices in relationship science frequently center Whiteness (e.g., "participants were mostly White"), obscure or overlook potential sexual orientation diversity (e.g., implying that individuals in man-woman dyads…
- 5top 5%
Seeing your life story as a Hero’s Journey increases meaning in life.
Benjamin Alan Rogers, Herrison Chicas, John Kelly, Emily Kubin, Michael S. Christian and 5 more
84 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspa0000341OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
). Eight studies reveal that the Hero's Journey predicts and can causally increase people's experience of meaning in life. We first distill the Hero's Journey into seven key elements-protagonist, shift, quest, allies, challenge, transformation, legacy-and then develop a new measure that assesses the perceived presence of the Hero's Journey narrative in people's life stories: the Hero's Journey Scale. Using this scale, we find a positive relationship between the Hero's Journey and meaning in life with both online participants (Studies 1-2) and older adults in a community sample (Study 3). We then develop a restorying intervention that leads people to see the events of their life as a Hero's Journey (Study 4). This intervention causally increases meaning in life (Study 5) by prompting people to reflect on important elements of their lives and connecting them into a coherent and compelling narrative (Study 6). This Hero's Journey restorying intervention also increases the extent to which people perceive meaning in an ambiguous grammar task (Study 7) and increases their resilience to…
- 6top 6%
The political is personal: The costs of daily politics.
Brett Quaid Ford, Matthew Feinberg, Bethany Lassetter, Sabrina Thai, Arasteh Gatchpazian
69 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspa0000335OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
= 1,277), and found causal support for the central findings of Studies 1-2. Overall, this research highlights how politics can be a chronic stressor in people's daily lives, underscoring the far-reaching influence politicians have beyond the formal powers endowed unto them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
- 7top 7%
Gender differences and variability in creative ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the greater male variability hypothesis in creativity.
Christa L. Taylor, Sameh Said‐Metwaly, Anaëlle Camarda, Baptiste Barbot
67 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspp0000484OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
= -0.10, 95% CI [-0.13, -0.06]) and a trivial variability advantage for males (lnVR = 0.02, 95% CI [0.004, 0.04]) in creative ability scores. However, the magnitude of the effect sizes was moderated by creative domain, task type, scoring type, and study region for mean differences and by country-level gender egalitarianism values for variability. Taken together, gender differences in the mean and variability of creative ability scores are minimal and inconsistent across different contexts, suggesting that the GMVH may not provide much explanatory power for the gender gap in creative achievement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
- 8top 8%
Listening to understand: The role of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude depolarization during disagreements.
Guy Itzchakov, Netta Weinstein, Mark R. Leary, Dvori Saluk, Moty Amar
65 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspa0000366OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Disagreements can polarize attitudes when they evoke defensiveness from the conversation partners. When a speaker talks, listeners often think about ways to counterargue. This process often fails to depolarize attitudes and might even backfire (i.e., the Boomerang effect). However, what happens in disagreements if one conversation partner genuinely listens to the other's perspective? We hypothesized that when conversation partners convey high-quality listening-characterized by attention, understanding, and positive intentions-speakers will feel more socially comfortable and connected to them (i.e., positivity resonance) and reflect on their attitudes in a less defensive manner (i.e., have self-insight). We further hypothesized that this process reduces perceived polarization (perceived attitude change, perceived attitude similarity with the listener) and actual polarization (reduced attitude extremity). Four experiments manipulated poor, moderate, and high-quality listening using a video vignette (Study 1) and live interactions (Studies 2-4). The results consistently supported the…
- 9top 9%
Growing old and being old: Emotional well-being across adulthood.
Susan Turk Charles, Jonathan Rush, Jennifer R. Piazza, Eric Scott Cerino, Jacqueline A. Mogle and 1 more
58 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000453OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The present study examines change in reports of daily, weekly, and monthly psychological distress over 20 years, and of negative and positive affect over 10 years, using data from the Midlife in the United States study. The study includes three waves of data collection on adults ranging from 22 to 95 years old. Cross-sectional findings reveal that older age is related to lower levels of psychological distress and negative affect and to higher levels of positive affect across each successive age group. Yet, longitudinal findings vary across younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychological distress decreases over time among younger adults (although only until age 33 for weekly reports), remains stable in midlife, and is stable (monthly) or slightly increases (daily and weekly) among older adults. For negative affect, levels decrease over time for younger and middle-aged adults, and only increase for the oldest adults for daily and monthly affect. Positive affect is stable over time among younger adults, but decreases in midlife starting in the mid-fifties. In conclusion, overall…
- 10top 10%
When and why we ostracize others: Motivated social exclusion in group contexts.
Selma C. Rudert, J. N. Rasmus Möring, Christoph Kenntemich, Christiane M. Büttner
56 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspi0000423OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
= 2,394, all preregistered) support our predictions: When asked to recall a recent ostracism decision and the motives for it, participants reported both perceived norm violations and/or expendability of the target as motives (Study 1). Switching to the target perspective, the frequency of experienced ostracism was associated with both self-perceived norm violations and expendability (Study 2). In five experiments (Studies 3-7), participants consistently choose to ostracize targets more often when they perceived them to be either norm-violating, or inept in a skill important for the group and thus expendable. Additionally, Studies 5-7 show that strategic considerations about the requirements of the situational context influence ostracism decisions: Participants were more likely to ostracize norm-violating targets in cooperative contexts, and more likely to ostracize inept targets in performance contexts. Results have strong theoretical implications for research on ostracism and group dynamics, as well as for interventions targeting ostracism behavior: Particularly, adjusting the…
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Journal of Personality and Social Psychology with publication year 2023, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.