Most-cited articles · 2020
The 10 most-cited articles in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2020
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 134 eligible articles Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published in 2020. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 810 citations: Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models..
- Cohort
- 134 articles
- Listed
- Top 10 (7.5%)
- Open access
- 8 of 10
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
The most-cited articles from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2020 cluster around a few broad themes. Methodological work leads the list: the top paper, "Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models," by Ulrich Orth, D. Angus Clark, M. Brent Donnellan and colleagues, has 810 citations. Other prominent entries examine intergroup and social dynamics, including intraminority stress and mental health among gay and bisexual men, and how extreme protest actions affect public support for social movements. A third strand concerns social inequality and cultural processes, such as cultural mismatch among first-generation college students.
For a reader, the list offers a snapshot of which 2020 articles in this journal drew the most scholarly attention, based on OpenAlex citation counts out of 134 eligible articles. It shows the range of topics that resonated, from statistical methods for longitudinal data to social movements, conspiracy beliefs, shared reality in relationships, life events, social media and self-esteem, prosocial spending, and effortful control. The ranking reflects citation activity only, not quality or importance.
Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 0.8%
Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models.
Ulrich Orth, D. Angus Clark, M. Brent Donnellan, Richard W. Robins
810 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000358OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
In virtually all areas of psychology, the question of whether a particular construct has a prospective effect on another is of fundamental importance. For decades, the cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) has been the model of choice for addressing this question. However, CLPMs have recently been critiqued, and numerous alternative models have been proposed. Using the association between low self-esteem and depression as a case study, we examined the behavior of seven competing longitudinal models in 10 samples, each with at least four waves of data and sample sizes ranging from 326 to 8,259. The models were compared in terms of convergence, fit statistics, and consistency of parameter estimates. The traditional CLPM and the random intercepts cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) converged in every sample, whereas the other models frequently failed to converge or did not converge properly. The RI-CLPM exhibited better model fit than the CLPM, whereas the CLPM produced more consistent cross-lagged effects (both across and within samples) than the RI-CLPM. We discuss the models from a…
- 2top 1.5%
Sex, status, competition, and exclusion: Intraminority stress from within the gay community and gay and bisexual men’s mental health.
John E. Pachankis, Kirsty A. Clark, Charles L. Burton, Jaclyn M. W. Hughto, Richard Bränström and 1 more
283 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000282OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
= 252). Overall, these experiments provide partial support for the possibility that gay and bisexual men's status concerns underlie their experience of gay community stress. Together, these studies advance psychological and sociological accounts of gay and bisexual men's mental health beyond minority stress theory, with implications for intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
- 3top 2.3%
The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements.
Matthew Feinberg, Robb Willer, Chloe Kovacheff
243 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspi0000230OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
How do protest actions impact public support for social movements? Here we test the claim that extreme protest actions-protest behaviors perceived to be harmful to others, highly disruptive, or both-typically reduce support for social movements. Across 6 experiments, including 3 that were preregistered, participants indicated less support for social movements that used more extreme protest actions. This result obtained across a variety of movements (e.g., animal rights, anti-Trump, anti-abortion) and extreme protest actions (e.g., blocking highways, vandalizing property). Further, in 5 of 6 studies, negative reactions to extreme protest actions also led participants to support the movement's central cause less, and these effects were largely independent of individuals' prior ideology or views on the issue. In all studies we found effects were driven by diminished social identification with the movement. In Studies 4-6, serial mediation analyses detailed a more in-depth model: observers viewed extreme protest actions to be immoral, reducing observers' emotional connection to the…
- 4top 3%
Access is not enough: Cultural mismatch persists to limit first-generation students’ opportunities for achievement throughout college.
L Taylor Phillips, Nicole K. Stephens, Sarah S. M. Townsend, Sébastien Goudeau
202 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspi0000234OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
United States higher education prioritizes independence as the cultural ideal. As a result, first-generation students (neither parent has a four-year degree) often confront an initial cultural mismatch early on in college settings: they endorse relatively interdependent cultural norms that diverge from the independent cultural ideal. This initial cultural mismatch can lead first-generation students to perform less well academically compared with continuing-generation students (one or more parents have a four-year degree) early in college. Yet, what happens as first-generation students experience the university culture throughout their time in college? Using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches, we find that initial cultural mismatch is associated with psychological and academic costs that persist until graduation. First, at college entry, we find social class differences in cultural norms: first-generation students endorse more interdependent cultural norms than their continuing-generation peers. Second, endorsing interdependence at college entry predicts reduced subjective…
- 5top 3.8%
What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.
Mirosław Kofta, Wiktor Soral, Michał Bilewicz
182 citationsdoi:10.1037/pspa0000183OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Belief in conspiracy theories about Jews is a prototypical example of how a naïve theory can serve as a universal explanation of "all the bad things happening in society." Such a theory often arises in times of political unrest that tend to breed feelings of uncertainty in politics and a lack of control over politics. As both uncertainty (a sense-making deficit) and lack of control (an agency deficit) can relate to conspiracy-based antisemitism, this research examines which of the two processes plays a pivotal role in the belief in Jewish conspiracy. Specifically, we hypothesize that political uncontrollability, rather than political uncertainty, is a critical factor in triggering conspiracy theories about groups. In Study 1 (N = 812) we found that lack of control, but not uncertainty, in the political domain predicted belief in Jewish conspiracy, and subsequently led to increased discriminatory attitudes toward Jews. The results of longitudinal Study 2 (N = 476) revealed that only political uncontrollability led to an increase in conspiracy-related stereotypes of Jews. In Study 3…
- 6top 4.5%
Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships.
Maya Rossignac‐Milon, Niall P. Bolger, Katherine S. Zee, Erica J. Boothby, Edward Tory Higgins
168 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1037/pspi0000266OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
-the subjective experience of sharing a set of inner states (e.g., thoughts, feelings, or beliefs) in common with a particular interaction partner about the world in general, including the world external to the relationship. Across 9 studies, we use mixed methods to investigate the unique role of generalized shared reality in interpersonal interactions, both between close partners and strangers. We hypothesize that generalized shared reality predicts how people connect with each other and perceive the world around them. We also investigate the observable, dyadic behavioral signatures of generalized shared reality in interpersonal interactions. Finally, we examine the motivation to uphold an existing sense of generalized shared reality. We hypothesize that couples high on baseline generalized shared reality exhibit motivated, dyadic interaction behaviors to reaffirm their generalized shared reality in the face of experimentally manipulated threat. By identifying a unique dimension of everyday interactions, these studies aim to capture a critical aspect of the lived subjective…
- 7top 5.3%
A dimensional taxonomy of perceived characteristics of major life events.
Maike Luhmann, Ina Faßbender, Mark Alcock, Peter Haehner
168 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1037/pspp0000291OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Major life events (MLEs) are studied in many different areas in psychology such as personality development, clinical psychology, or posttraumatic growth. In all of these areas, a common finding is that MLEs differ in their effects on psychological outcomes. However, a framework that allows a systematic examination of these differences is still absent. This article presents a systematic literature review and 4 empirical studies (Ns between 226 and 449, total N = 1,477) in which we developed and evaluated a dimensional taxonomy of 9 perceived characteristics of MLEs: valence, impact, predictability, challenge, emotional significance, change in worldviews, social status changes, external control, and extraordinariness. These event characteristics can be measured reliably with the Event Characteristics Questionnaire (ECQ). Perceived event characteristics predicted individual differences in changes in subjective well-being in both retrospective and longitudinal data after MLEs over and above established predictors of subjective well-being such as personality and demographic…
- 8top 6%
When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem.
Claire Midgley, Sabrina Thai, Penelope Lockwood, Chloe Kovacheff, Elizabeth Page‐Gould
162 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1037/pspi0000336OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Although past research has shown that social comparisons made through social media contribute to negative outcomes, little is known about the nature of these comparisons (domains, direction, and extremity), variables that determine comparison outcomes (post valence, perceiver's self-esteem), and how these comparisons differ from those made in other contexts (e.g., text messages, face-to-face interactions). In 4 studies (N = 798), we provide the first comprehensive analysis of how individuals make and respond to social comparisons on social media, using comparisons made in real-time while browsing news feeds (Study 1), experimenter-generated comparisons (Study 2), and comparisons made on social media versus in other contexts (Studies 3 and 4). More frequent and more extreme upward comparisons resulted in immediate declines in self-evaluations as well as cumulative negative effects on individuals' state self-esteem, mood, and life satisfaction after a social media browsing session. Moreover, downward and lateral comparisons occurred less frequently and did little to mitigate upward…
- 9top 6.8%
Does spending money on others promote happiness?: A registered replication report.
Lara B. Aknin, Elizabeth Warren Dunn, Jason D. E. Proulx, Iris Lok, Michael I. Norton
147 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1037/pspa0000191OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Research indicates that spending money on others—prosocial spending—leads to greater happiness than spending money on oneself (e.g., Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008; 2014). These findings have received widespread attention because they offer insight into why people engage in costly prosocial behavior, and what constitutes happier spending more broadly. However, most studies on prosocial spending (like most research on the emotional benefits of generosity) utilized small sample sizes (n<100/cell). In light of new, improved standards for evidentiary value, we conducted high-powered registered replications of the central paradigms used in prosocial spending research. In Experiment 1, 712 students were randomly assigned to make a purchase for themselves or a stranger in need and then reported their happiness. As predicted, participants assigned to engage in prosocial (vs. personal) spending reported greater momentary happiness. In Experiment 2, 1950 adults recalled a time they spent money on themselves or someone else and then reported their current happiness; contrary to predictions,…
- 10top 7.5%
The development of effortful control from late childhood to young adulthood.
Olivia E. Atherton, Katherine M. Lawson, Richard W. Robins
143 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/pspp0000283OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The present study investigated the developmental precursors of effortful control, a temperament trait that involves the propensity to regulate one’s impulses and behaviors, to motivate the self towards a goal when there are conflicting desires, and to focus and shift attention easily. Data came from the California Families Project, a multi-method longitudinal study of 674 Mexican-origin youth (and their parents), who were assessed at ages 10, 12, 14, 16, and 19. Effortful control (measured via self- and parent-reports) was moderately stable over time (r=.47 from age 10 to 19), and its developmental trajectory followed a u-shaped pattern (decreasing from age 10 to 14, before increasing from age 14 to 19). Findings from latent growth curve models showed that youth who experience more hostility from their parents, associate more with deviant peers, attend more violent schools, live in more violent neighborhoods, and experience more ethnic discrimination tend to exhibit an exacerbated dip in effortful control. In contrast, youth with parents who closely monitor their behavior and…
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Journal of Personality and Social Psychology with publication year 2020, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.