Most-cited articles · 2020
The 10 most-cited articles in American Economic Review, 2020
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 130 eligible articles American Economic Review published in 2020. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 5,018 citations: Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.
- Cohort
- 130 articles
- Listed
- Top 10 (7.7%)
- Open access
- 8 of 10
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
The most-cited articles published in American Economic Review in 2020 are led by methodological work in econometrics, with Clément de Chaisemartin and Xavier D'Haultfœuille's "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects" receiving 5,018 citations. Other prominent themes include trade and political economy, represented by David Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson's study of import competition and political polarization, and the economics of innovation and data, including work on research productivity and the nonrivalry of data.
For readers, the list offers a view of the topics and papers that drew the most attention in the economics literature that year, as measured by OpenAlex citation counts across 130 eligible articles. It reflects which contributions were most frequently cited by subsequent research, without indicating quality or importance beyond citation frequency.
Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 0.8%
Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D’Haultfœuille
5,018 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20181169OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Linear regressions with period and group fixed effects are widely used to estimate treatment effects. We show that they estimate weighted sums of the average treatment effects (ATE ) in each group and period, with weights that may be negative. Due to the negative weights, the linear regression coefficient may for instance be negative while all the ATEs are positive. We propose another estimator that solves this issue. In the two applications we revisit, it is significantly different from the linear regression estimator. (JEL C21, C23, D72, J31, J51, L82)
- 2top 1.6%
Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How
Paul S. Goldsmith-Pinkham, Isaac Sorkin, Henry Swift
2,514 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20181047OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The Bartik instrument is formed by interacting local industry shares and national industry growth rates. We show that the typical use of a Bartik instrument assumes a pooled exposure research design, where the shares measure differential exposure to common shocks, and identification is based on exogeneity of the shares. Next, we show how the Bartik instrument weights each of the exposure designs. Finally, we discuss how to assess the plausibility of the research design. We illustrate our results through two applications: estimating the elasticity of labor supply, and estimating the elasticity of substitution between immigrants and natives. (JEL C51, F14, J15, J22, L60, R23, R32)
- 3top 2.4%
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
David Autor, David Dorn, Gordon Hanson, Kaveh Majlesi
1,056 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20170011OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Has rising import competition contributed to the polarization of US politics? Analyzing multiple measures of political expression and results of congressional and presidential elections spanning the period 2000 through 2016, we find strong though not definitive evidence of an ideological realignment in trade-exposed local labor markets that commences prior to the divisive 2016 US presidential election. Exploiting the exogenous component of rising import competition by China, we find that trade exposed electoral districts simultaneously exhibit growing ideological polarization in some domains, meaning expanding support for both strong-left and strong-right views, and pure rightward shifts in others. Specifically, trade-impacted commuting zones or districts saw an increasing market share for the Fox News channel (a rightward shift), stronger ideological polarization in campaign contributions (a polarized shift), and a relative rise in the likelihood of electing a Republican to Congress (a rightward shift). Trade-exposed counties with an initial majority White population became more…
- 4top 3.1%
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?
Nicholas Bloom, Charles I. Jones, John Michael Van Reenen, Michael Webb
1,000 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20180338OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Long-run growth in many models is the product of two terms: the effective number of researchers and their research productivity. We present evidence from various industries, products, and firms showing that research effort is rising substantially while research productivity is declining sharply. A good example is Moore’s Law. The number of researchers required today to achieve the famous doubling of computer chip density is more than 18 times larger than the number required in the early 1970s. More generally, everywhere we look we find that ideas, and the exponential growth they imply, are getting harder to find. (JEL D24, E23, O31, O47)
- 5top 3.9%
Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data
Charles I. Jones, Christopher Tonetti
943 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20191330OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Data is nonrival: a person’s location history, medical records, and driving data can be used by many firms simultaneously. Nonrivalry leads to increasing returns. As a result, there may be social gains to data being used broadly across firms, even in the presence of privacy considerations. Fearing creative destruction, firms may choose to hoard their data, leading to the inefficient use of nonrival data. Giving data property rights to consumers can generate allocations that are close to optimal. Consumers balance their concerns for privacy against the economic gains that come from selling data broadly. (JEL C80, D11, D21, D83, E22, K11, O34)
- 6top 4.7%
The Welfare Effects of Social Media
Hunt Allcott, Luca Braghieri, Sarah Eichmeyer, Matthew Aaron Gentzkow
856 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20190658OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
The rise of social media has provoked both optimism about potential societal benefits and concern about harms such as addiction, depression, and political polarization. In a randomized experiment, we find that deactivating Facebook for the four weeks before the 2018 US midterm election (i) reduced online activity, while increasing offline activities such as watching TV alone and socializing with family and friends; (ii) reduced both factual news knowledge and political polarization; (iii) increased subjective well-being; and post-experiment Facebook use. Deactivation reduced post-experiment valuations of Facebook, suggesting that traditional metrics may overstate consumer surplus. (JEL D12, D72, D90, I31, L82, L86, Z13)
- 7top 5.4%
Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Pricing, and Collusion
Emilio Calvano, Giacomo Calzolari, Vincenzo Denicolò, Sergio Pastorello
666 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20190623OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Increasingly, algorithms are supplanting human decision-makers in pricing goods and services. To analyze the possible consequences, we study experimentally the behavior of algorithms powered by Artificial Intelligence (Q-learning) in a workhorse oligopoly model of repeated price competition. We find that the algorithms consistently learn to charge supracompetitive prices, without communicating with one another. The high prices are sustained by collusive strategies with a finite phase of punishment followed by a gradual return to cooperation. This finding is robust to asymmetries in cost or demand, changes in the number of players, and various forms of uncertainty. (JEL D21, D43, D83, L12, L13)
- 8top 6.2%
Arrival of Young Talent: The Send-Down Movement and Rural Education in China
Yi Chen, Ziying Fan, Xiaomin Gu, Li‐An Zhou
631 citationsdoi:10.1257/aer.20191414OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
This paper estimates the effects on rural education of the send-down movement during the Cultural Revolution, when about 16 million urban youth were mandated to resettle in the countryside. Using a county-level dataset compiled from local gazetteers and population censuses, we show that greater exposure to the sent-down youths significantly increased rural children’s educational achievement. This positive effect diminished after the urban youth left the countryside in the late 1970s but never disappeared. Rural children who interacted with the sent-down youths were also more likely to pursue more-skilled occupations, marry later, and have smaller families than those who did not. (JEL I21, J13, J24, N35, O15, P36, R23)
- 9top 7%
Dominant Currency Paradigm
Gita Gopinath, Emine Boz, Camila Casas, Federico J. Díez, Pierre‐Olivier Gourinchas and 1 more
625 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1257/aer.20171201OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
We propose a “dominant currency paradigm” with three key features: dominant currency pricing, pricing complementarities, and imported inputs in production. We test this paradigm using a new dataset of bilateral price and volume indices for more than 2,500 country pairs that covers 91 percent of world trade, as well as detailed firm-product-country data for Colombian exports and imports. In strong support of the paradigm we find that (i) noncommodities terms-of-trade are uncorrelated with exchange rates; (ii) the dollar exchange rate quantitatively dominates the bilateral exchange rate in price pass-through and trade elasticity regressions, and this effect is increasing in the share of imports invoiced in dollars; (iii) US import volumes are significantly less sensitive to bilateral exchange rates, compared to other countries’ imports; (iv) a 1 percent US dollar appreciation against all other currencies predicts a 0.6 percent decline within a year in the volume of total trade between countries in the rest of the world, controlling for the global business cycle. We characterize the…
- 10top 7.7%
Overreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations
Pedro Bordalo, Nicola Gennaioli, Yueran Ma, Andrei Shleifer
610 citationsdoi:10.1257/aer.20181219OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
We study the rationality of individual and consensus forecasts of macroeconomic and financial variables using the methodology of Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015), who examine predictability of forecast errors from forecast revisions. We find that individual forecasters typically overreact to news, while consensus forecasts under-react relative to full-information rational expectations. We reconcile these findings within a diagnostic expectations version of a dispersed information learning model. Structural estimation indicates that departures from Bayesian updating in the form of diagnostic overreaction capture important variation in forecast biases across different series, yielding a belief distortion parameter similar to estimates obtained in other settings. (JEL C53, D83, D84, E13, E17, E27, E47)
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to American Economic Review with publication year 2020, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.