Most-cited articles · 2022
The 10 most-cited articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2022
Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 41 eligible articles The Quarterly Journal of Economics published in 2022. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 1,456 citations: When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?.
- Cohort
- 41 articles
- Listed
- Top 10 (24.4%)
- Open access
- 4 of 10
- Snapshot
- 2026-10-29
The 2022 list is led by methodological and empirical work in applied econometrics and labor economics. The most-cited article is "When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?" by Alberto Abadie, Susan Carleton Athey, Guido W. Imbens and coauthors, with 1,456 citations, followed by "The Slope of the Phillips Curve: Evidence from U.S. States" at 328 citations and "The Gender Gap in Self-Promotion" at 249 citations. Other highly cited entries address discrimination, wealth, preschool, innovation funding, property taxation, law and economics, and asset specificity.
For readers, the ranking offers a snapshot of which 2022 articles in the journal drew the most attention in the OpenAlex citation data, out of 41 eligible articles. It shows the topics and research approaches that circulated most widely, while the citation counts reflect accumulated references rather than a judgment on quality.
Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.
Ask about these papers
Grounded in this list only, with sources.
- 1top 2.5%
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
Alberto Abadie, Susan Carleton Athey, Guido W. Imbens, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge
1,456 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac038OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract Clustered standard errors, with clusters defined by factors such as geography, are widespread in empirical research in economics and many other disciplines. Formally, clustered standard errors adjust for the correlations induced by sampling the outcome variable from a data-generating process with unobserved cluster-level components. However, the standard econometric framework for clustering leaves important questions unanswered: (i) Why do we adjust standard errors for clustering in some ways but not others, for example, by state but not by gender, and in observational studies but not in completely randomized experiments? (ii) Is the clustered variance estimator valid if we observe a large fraction of the clusters in the population? (iii) In what settings does the choice of whether and how to cluster make a difference? We address these and other questions using a novel framework for clustered inference on average treatment effects. In addition to the common sampling component, the new framework incorporates a design component that accounts for the variability induced on the…
- 2top 4.9%
The Slope of the Phillips Curve: Evidence from U.S. States
Jonathon Hazell, Juan David Herreño, Emi Nakamura, Jón Steinsson
328 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac010OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We estimate the slope of the Phillips curve in the cross section of U.S. states using newly constructed state-level price indices for nontradeable goods back to 1978. Our estimates indicate that the slope of the Phillips curve is small and was small even during the early 1980s. We estimate only a modest decline in the slope of the Phillips curve since the 1980s. We use a multiregion model to infer the slope of the aggregate Phillips curve from our regional estimates. Applying our estimates to recent unemployment dynamics yields essentially no missing disinflation or missing reinflation over the past few business cycles. Our results imply that the sharp drop in core inflation in the early 1980s was mostly due to shifting expectations about long-run monetary policy as opposed to a steep Phillips curve, and the greater stability of inflation between 1990 and 2020 is mostly due to long-run inflation expectations becoming more firmly anchored.
- 3top 7.4%
The Gender Gap in Self-Promotion
Christine L. Exley, Judd B. Kessler
249 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1093/qje/qjac003OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We run a series of experiments involving over 4,000 online participants and over 10,000 school-aged youth. When individuals are asked to subjectively describe their performance on a male-typed task relating to math and science, we find a large gender gap in self-evaluations. This gap arises when self-evaluations are provided to potential employers, and thus measure self-promotion, and when self-evaluations are not driven by incentives to promote. The gender gap in self-evaluations proves to be persistent and arises as early as the sixth grade. No gender gap arises if individuals are asked about their performance on a more female-typed task.
- 4top 9.8%
Systemic Discrimination Among Large U.S. Employers
Patrick Kline, Evan K. Rose, Christopher Walters
212 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac024OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We study the results of a massive nationwide correspondence experiment sending more than 83,000 fictitious applications with randomized characteristics to geographically dispersed jobs posted by 108 of the largest U.S. employers. Distinctively Black names reduce the probability of employer contact by 2.1 percentage points relative to distinctively white names. The magnitude of this racial gap in contact rates differs substantially across firms, exhibiting a between-company standard deviation of 1.9 percentage points. Despite an insignificant average gap in contact rates between male and female applicants, we find a between-company standard deviation in gender contact gaps of 2.7 percentage points, revealing that some firms favor male applicants and others favor women. Company-specific racial contact gaps are temporally and spatially persistent, and negatively correlated with firm profitability, federal contractor status, and a measure of recruiting centralization. Discrimination exhibits little geographical dispersion, but two-digit industry explains roughly half of the…
- 5top 12.2%
Top Wealth in America: New Estimates Under Heterogeneous Returns
Matthew Smith, Owen M. Zidar, Eric Zwick
130 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac033OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract This article uses administrative tax data to estimate top wealth in the United States. We assemble new data that link people to their sources of capital income and develop new methods to estimate the degree of return heterogeneity within asset classes. Disaggregated fixed-income data reveal that rich individuals earn much more of their interest income in higher-yielding forms and have much greater exposure to credit risk. Consequently, in recent years, the interest rate on fixed income at the top is approximately 3.5 times higher than the average. We value the population of U.S. firms using firm-level characteristics and apportion this wealth using firm-owner links. We combine this new data on fixed income and pass-through business returns with refined estimates of C-corporation equity, housing, and pension wealth to deliver new capitalized wealth estimates that build upon the methods of Saez and Zucman (2016a). From 1989 to 2016, the top 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% wealth shares increased by 6.6, 4.6, and 2.9 percentage points, respectively, to 33.7%, 15.7%, and 7.1%. Overall,…
- 6top 14.7%
The Long-Term Effects of Universal Preschool in Boston
Guthrie Gray-Lobe, Parag A. Pathak, Christopher Walters
127 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac036OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We use admissions lotteries to estimate the effects of large-scale public preschool in Boston on college-going, college preparation, standardized test scores, and behavioral outcomes. Preschool enrollment boosts college attendance as well as SAT test taking and high school graduation. Preschool also decreases high school disciplinary measures including juvenile incarceration, but has no detectable effect on state achievement test scores. An analysis of subgroups shows that effects on college enrollment, SAT-taking, and disciplinary outcomes are larger for boys than for girls. Our findings illustrate possibilities for large-scale modern, public preschool and highlight the importance of measuring long-term and non–test score outcomes in evaluating the effectiveness of education programs.
- 7top 17.1%
Cutting the Innovation Engine: How Federal Funding Shocks Affect University Patenting, Entrepreneurship, and Publications
Tania Babina, Alex Xi He, Sabrina T Howell, Elisabeth Ruth Perlman, Joseph Staudt
116 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac046OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract This article studies how federal funding affects the innovation outputs of university researchers. We link person-level research grants from 22 universities to patents, publications, and career outcomes from the U.S. Census Bureau. We focus on the effects of large, idiosyncratic, and temporary cuts to federal funding in a researcher’s preexisting narrow field of study. Using an event study design, we document that these negative federal funding shocks reduce high-tech entrepreneurship and publications but increase patenting. The lost publications tend to be higher quality and more basic, whereas the additional patents tend to be lower quality, less general, and more often privately assigned. These federal funding cuts lead to an increase in private funding, which partially compensates for the decline in federal funding. Together with evidence from industry-university contracts, the results suggest that federal funding cuts shift university research funding from federal to private sources and lead to innovation outputs that are less openly accessible and more often…
- 8top 19.6%
The Assessment Gap: Racial Inequalities in Property Taxation
Carlos F. Avenancio-León, Troup Howard
111 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac009OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We document a nationwide “assessment gap” that leads local governments to place a disproportionate fiscal burden on racial and ethnic minorities. We show that holding taxing jurisdictions and property tax rates fixed, Black and Hispanic residents face a 10%–13% higher tax burden for the same bundle of public services. We decompose this disparity into between- and within-neighborhood components and find that just over half of it arises between neighborhoods. We then present evidence on mechanisms. Property assessments are less sensitive to neighborhood attributes than market prices are. This generates spatial variation in tax burden within jurisdiction and leads to overtaxation of communities with a high share of minority residents. We also find appeals behavior and appeals outcomes differ by race within neighborhood. Inequality does not arise from (i) racial differences in transaction prices or (ii) differences in features of the housing stock.
- 9top 22%
Ideas Have Consequences: The Impact of Law and Economics on American Justice
Elliott Ash, Daniel L. Chen, Suresh Naidu
106 citationsOpen access (CC-BY-NC)doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf042OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract This article empirically studies the effects of the early law and economics movement on the U.S. judiciary. We focus on the Manne Economics Institute for Federal Judges, an intensive economics course that trained almost half of federal judges between 1976 and 1999. Using the universe of published opinions in U.S. Circuit Courts and 1 million District Court criminal sentencing decisions, we estimate the within-judge effect of Manne program attendance. Selection into attendance was limited, as the program was popular among judges of all backgrounds, frequently oversubscribed, and admitted participants on a first-come, first-served basis. We find that after attending economics training, participating judges use more economics language in their opinions, rule against regulatory agencies more often, and impose more severe criminal sentences. We argue that economics, as a rigorous social science, was especially effective in persuading judges.
- 10top 24.4%
Asset Specificity of Nonfinancial Firms
Amir Kermani, Yueran Ma
98 citationsdoi:10.1093/qje/qjac030OpenAlex
Show abstractHide abstract
Abstract We develop a new data set to study asset specificity among nonfinancial firms. Our data cover the liquidation values of each category of assets on firms’ balance sheets and provides information across major industries. First, we find that nonfinancial firms have high asset specificity. For example, the liquidation value of fixed assets is 35% of the net book value in the average industry. Second, we analyze the determinants of asset specificity and document that assets’ physical attributes (e.g., mobility, durability, and customization) play a crucial role. Third, we investigate several implications. Consistent with theories of investment irreversibility, high asset specificity is associated with less disinvestment and stronger effects of uncertainty on investment activities. We also find that the increasing prevalence of intangible assets has not significantly reduced firms’ liquidation values.
How to read this list
The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to The Quarterly Journal of Economics with publication year 2022, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.
Other journals, same idea
Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi
- The papers land in your library with their DOIs
- Ask anything across all of them, with citations
- Draft a literature review from the same sources
Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.
Reading several of these?
Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.