Most-cited articles · 2018

The 10 most-cited articles in Psychological Bulletin, 2018

Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 40 eligible articles Psychological Bulletin published in 2018. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 637 citations: Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review..

Cohort
40 articles
Listed
Top 10 (25.0%)
Open access
9 of 10
Snapshot
2026-10-29

The most-cited articles in Psychological Bulletin in 2018 cluster around a few themes. Executive functioning and multitasking dominate the top of the list, with the leading paper being "Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review" by Lehtonen, Soveri, Laine and colleagues at 637 citations. The second and third papers, on the unity and diversity of executive functions and on cognitive structure in multitasking, continue this focus. Other highly cited works address prediction in language comprehension, emotion and the autonomic nervous system, dishonest behavior, and models of short-term and working memory.

Readers can use this list as a guide to the meta-analytic and integrative reviews that drew the most attention in the journal that year. The entries span several subfields of psychology, and the citation counts offer one indication of which reviews were most frequently consulted in subsequent research.

Introduction written from the titles and abstracts on this list. Every figure below is the source.

Ask about these papers

Grounded in this list only, with sources.

3 of 3 free questions left today, no account needed
  1. 1
    top 2.5%

    Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review.

    Minna Lehtonen, Anna Soveri, Aini Laine, Janica Järvenpää, Angela de Bruin and 1 more

    637 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1037/bul0000142OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Because of enduring experience of managing two languages, bilinguals have been argued to develop superior executive functioning compared with monolinguals. Despite extensive investigation, there is, however, no consensus regarding the existence of such a bilingual advantage. Here we synthesized comparisons of bilinguals' and monolinguals' performance in six executive domains using 891 effect sizes from 152 studies on adults. We also included unpublished data, and considered the potential influence of a number of study-, task-, and participant-related variables. Before correcting estimates for observed publication bias, our analyses revealed a very small bilingual advantage for inhibition, shifting, and working memory, but not for monitoring or attention. No evidence for a bilingual advantage remained after correcting for bias. For verbal fluency, our analyses indicated a small bilingual disadvantage, possibly reflecting less exposure for each individual language when using two languages in a balanced manner. Moreover, moderator analyses did not support theoretical presuppositions…

  2. 2
    top 5%

    The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

    Justin E. Karr, Corson N. Areshenkoff, Philippe Rast, Scott Michael Hofer, Grant L. Iverson and 1 more

    636 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000160OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been frequently applied to executive function measurement since first used to identify a three-factor model of inhibition, updating, and shifting; however, subsequent CFAs have supported inconsistent models across the lifespan, ranging from unidimensional to nested-factor models (i.e., bifactor without inhibition). This systematic review summarized CFAs on performance-based tests of executive functions and reanalyzed summary data to identify best-fitting models. Eligible CFAs involved 46 samples (N=9,756). The most frequently accepted models varied by age (i.e., preschool=one/two-factor; school-age=three-factor; adolescent/adult=three/nested-factor; older adult=two/three-factor), and most often included updating/working memory, inhibition, and shifting factors. A bootstrap reanalysis simulated 5,000 samples from 21 correlation atrices (11 child/adolescent; 10 adult) from studies including the three most common factors, fitting seven competing models. Model results were summarized as the mean percent accepted (i.e., average rate at which models…

  3. 3
    top 7.5%

    Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.

    Iring Koch, Edita Poljac, Hermann Müller, Andrea Kiesel

    611 citationsdoi:10.1037/bul0000144OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Numerous studies showed decreased performance in situations that require multiple tasks or actions relative to appropriate control conditions. Because humans often engage in such multitasking activities, it is important to understand how multitasking affects performance. In the present article, we argue that research on dual-task interference and sequential task switching has proceeded largely separately using different experimental paradigms and methodology. In our article we aim at organizing this complex set of research in terms of three complementary research perspectives on human multitasking. One perspective refers to structural accounts in terms of cognitive bottlenecks (i.e., critical processing stages). A second perspective refers to cognitive flexibility in terms of the underlying cognitive control processes. A third perspective emphasizes cognitive plasticity in terms of the influence of practice on human multitasking abilities. With our review article we aimed at highlighting the value of an integrative position that goes beyond isolated consideration of a single…

  4. 4
    top 10%

    Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.

    Martin John Pickering, Chiara Gambi

    520 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000158OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Researchers agree that comprehenders regularly predict upcoming language, but they do not always agree on what prediction is (and how to differentiate it from integration) or what constitutes evidence for it. After defining prediction, we show that it occurs at all linguistic levels from semantics to form, and then propose a theory of which mechanisms comprehenders use to predict. We argue that they most effectively predict using their production system (i.e., prediction-by-production): They covertly imitate the linguistic form of the speaker's utterance and construct a representation of the underlying communicative intention. Comprehenders can then run this intention through their own production system to prepare the predicted utterance. But doing so takes time and resources, and comprehenders vary in the extent of preparation, with many groups of comprehenders (non-native speakers, illiterates, children, and older adults) using it less than typical native young adults. We thus argue that prediction-by-production is an optional mechanism, which is augmented by mechanisms based on…

  5. 5
    top 12.5%

    Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories.

    Erika Hansen Siegel, Molly K. Sands, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Paul Condon, Yale Chang and 3 more

    514 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000128OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    The classical view of emotion hypothesizes that certain emotion categories have a specific autonomic nervous system (ANS) "fingerprint" that is distinct from other categories. Substantial ANS variation within a category is presumed to be epiphenomenal. The theory of constructed emotion hypothesizes that an emotion category is a population of context-specific, highly variable instances that need not share an ANS fingerprint. Instead, ANS variation within a category is a meaningful part of the nature of emotion. We present a meta-analysis of 202 studies measuring ANS reactivity during lab-based inductions of emotion in nonclinical samples of adults, using a random effects, multilevel meta-analysis and multivariate pattern classification analysis to test our hypotheses. We found increases in mean effect size for 59.4% of ANS variables across emotion categories, but the pattern of effect sizes did not clearly distinguish 1 emotion category from another. We also observed significant variation within emotion categories; heterogeneity accounted for a moderate to substantial percentage…

  6. 6
    top 15%

    The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.

    Philipp Gerlach, Kinneret Teodorescu, Ralph Hertwig

    455 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000174OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Over the past decade, a large and growing body of experimental research has analyzed dishonest behavior. Yet the findings as to when people engage in (dis)honest behavior are to some extent unclear and even contradictory. A systematic analysis of the factors associated with dishonest behavior thus seems desirable. This meta-analysis reviews four of the most widely used experimental paradigms: sender-receiver games, die-roll tasks, coin-flip tasks, and matrix tasks. We integrate data from 565 experiments (totaling N = 44,050 choices) to address many of the ongoing debates on who behaves dishonestly and under what circumstances. Our findings show that dishonest behavior depends on both situational factors, such as reward magnitude and externalities, and personal factors, such as the participant's gender and age. Further, laboratory studies are associated with more dishonesty than field studies, and the use of deception in experiments is associated with less dishonesty. To some extent, the different experimental paradigms come to different conclusions. For example, a comparable…

  7. 7
    top 17.5%

    Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.

    Klaus Oberauer, Stephan Lewandowsky, Edward Awh, Gordon D. A. Brown, Andrew R. A. Conway and 11 more

    447 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000153OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Any mature field of research in psychology-such as short-term/working memory-is characterized by a wealth of empirical findings. It is currently unrealistic to expect a theory to explain them all; theorists must satisfice with explaining a subset of findings. The aim of the present article is to make the choice of that subset less arbitrary and idiosyncratic than is current practice. We propose criteria for identifying benchmark findings that every theory in a field should be able to explain: Benchmarks should be reproducible, generalize across materials and methodological variations, and be theoretically informative. We propose a set of benchmarks for theories and computational models of short-term and working memory. The benchmarks are described in as theory-neutral a way as possible, so that they can serve as empirical common ground for competing theoretical approaches. Benchmarks are rated on three levels according to their priority for explanation. Selection and ratings of the benchmarks is based on consensus among the authors, who jointly represent a broad range of theoretical…

  8. 8
    top 20%

    Development of self-esteem from age 4 to 94 years: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Ulrich Orth, Ruth Yasemin Erol, Eva C. Luciano

    438 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000161OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    = 0.76). Moderator analyses were conducted for the full set of samples and for the subset of samples between ages 10 to 20 years. Although the measure of self-esteem accounted for differences in effect sizes, the moderator analyses suggested that the pattern of mean-level change held across gender, country, ethnicity, sample type, and birth cohort. The meta-analytic findings clarify previously unresolved issues about the nature and magnitude of self-esteem change in specific developmental periods (i.e., childhood, adolescence, and old age) and draw a much more precise picture of the life span trajectory of self-esteem. (PsycINFO Database Record

  9. 9
    top 22.5%

    What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.

    T. D. Stanley, Evan C. Carter, Hristos Doucouliagos

    307 citationsOpen access (CC-BY)doi:10.1037/bul0000169OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Can recent failures to replicate psychological research be explained by typical magnitudes of statistical power, bias or heterogeneity? A large survey of 12,065 estimated effect sizes from 200 meta-analyses and nearly 8,000 papers is used to assess these key dimensions of replicability. First, our survey finds that psychological research is, on average, afflicted with low statistical power. The median of median power across these 200 areas of research is about 36%, and only about 8% of studies have adequate power (using Cohen's 80% convention). Second, the median proportion of the observed variation among reported effect sizes attributed to heterogeneity is 74% (I2). Heterogeneity of this magnitude makes it unlikely that the typical psychological study can be closely replicated when replication is defined as study-level null hypothesis significance testing. Third, the good news is that we find only a small amount of average residual reporting bias, allaying some of the often-expressed concerns about the reach of publication bias and questionable research practices. Nonetheless, the…

  10. 10
    top 25%

    Quasi-experimental evidence on short- and long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A meta-analysis.

    Tabea Schoeler, Lauren Duncan, Charlotte A. M. Cecil, George B. Ploubidis, Jean‐Baptiste Pingault

    297 citationsOpen access (OTHER-OA)doi:10.1037/bul0000171OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    Exposure to bullying victimization is associated with a wide-range of short and long-term adverse outcomes. However, the extent to which these associations reflect a causal influence of bullying victimization remains disputed. Here, we aimed to provide the most stringent evidence regarding the consequences of bullying victimization by meta-analyzing all relevant quasi-experimental (QE) studies. Multilevel random effects models and metaregression were employed to (a) estimate the pooled QE-adjusted effect size (Cohen d) for bullying victimization on outcomes and to (b) evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 16 studies were included. We derived 101 QE-estimates from three different methods (twin design, fixed effects analysis, and propensity score matching) for three pools of outcomes (internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, academic difficulties). QE-adjusted effects were small for internalizing symptoms (dadjusted = 0.27, 95% CI [0.05, 0.49]), and smaller for externalizing symptoms (dadjusted = 0.15, 95% CI [0.10, 0.21]) and academic difficulties (dadjusted…

How to read this list

The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to Psychological Bulletin with publication year 2018, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 10 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.

Other journals, same idea

Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi

  • The papers land in your library with their DOIs
  • Ask anything across all of them, with citations
  • Draft a literature review from the same sources

Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.

Reading several of these?

Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.