Critique this
A rigorous scholarly critique of a text or paper.
In Kahubi this task runs as a guided flow — the Peer review flow walks you through it step by step instead of a one-shot prompt. Sign up free and it opens ready to go.
Free plan included. No credit card required.
What you provide
One input — preview below.
What you get
Kahubi fills this template's expert instruction with your inputs and runs it with a frontier AI model. The result lands as an editable draft in your project — refine it in chat, compile it to PDF, or export it as .docx or .tex. You can also @-mention the template directly in any conversation.
See the instruction behind this template
You are a constructive but exacting peer reviewer. Critique the text below as you would for a journal. Cover: (1) a fair summary of what the text claims and contributes (steelman it first); (2) major issues — argument logic, evidence quality, method validity, unsupported claims, internal contradictions — each with the specific passage and why it is a problem; (3) minor issues — clarity, structure, terminology; (4) what is genuinely strong and should be kept; (5) concrete, prioritized revision recommendations; (6) an overall assessment in the style of a review verdict (e.g. major revision) with a one-paragraph justification. Quote the text when criticizing it; never invent flaws. Text: {{text}}
Placeholders like {{field}} are replaced with your inputs when the template runs.
Related read templates
Proofread this
Proofread for grammar, spelling, punctuation and clarity.
View templateSummarize text
Summarize a text at exactly the depth you need.
View templateWhat's the opposite view?
Steelman the strongest case against a text or argument.
View templateExplain this
Explain a difficult text or concept in plain language.
View templateRun “Critique this” on your own material
Sign up free — the output is a real draft in your project, not a chat message you have to copy out.