Most-cited articles · 2018

The 10 most-cited articles in The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 2018

Ranked by OpenAlex citation count on 29 October 2026, out of 172 eligible articles The American Journal of the Medical Sciences published in 2018. Ranks are frozen; this page will not change. Number one, with 200 citations: Development of the Pediatric Gut Microbiome: Impact on Health and Disease.

Cohort
172 articles
Listed
Top 10 (5.8%)
Open access
4 of 10
Snapshot
2026-10-29

Ask about these papers

Grounded in this list only, with sources.

3 of 3 free questions left today, no account needed
  1. 1
    top 0.6%

    Development of the Pediatric Gut Microbiome: Impact on Health and Disease

    Faith D. Ihekweazu, James A. Versalovic

    200 citationsOpen access (CC-BY-NC-ND)doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.08.005OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    The intestinal microbiota are important in human growth and development. Microbial composition may yield insights into the temporal development of microbial communities and vulnerabilities to disorders of microbial ecology such as recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Discoveries of key microbiome features of carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism are lending new insights into possible therapies or preventative strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the development of the pediatric gastrointestinal microbiome, the influence of the microbiome on the developing brain through the gut-brain axis, and the impact of dysbiosis on disease development. Dysbiosis is explored in the context of pediatric allergy and asthma, recurrent C. difficile infection, IBD, IBS, and metabolic disorders. The central premise is that the human intestinal microbiome plays a vital role in health and disease, beginning in the prenatal period and extending throughout childhood.

  2. 2
    top 1.2%

    Glycemic Variability: How to Measure and Its Clinical Implication for Type 2 Diabetes

    Guillermo E. Umpierrez, Boris P. Kovatchev

    148 citationsOpen access (CC-BY-NC-ND)doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.09.010OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    (A1C) levels have traditionally been the gold standard for assessing glycemic control and treatment efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, A1C does not take into account fluctuations in blood glucose levels known as glycemic variability (GV). In recent years, GV has become increasingly clinically relevant, because of a better understanding of the need to reach target A1C while avoiding hypoglycemia. GV relates to both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and has been associated with poorer quality of life. Diabetes treatments targeting multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are most beneficial in controlling A1C and reducing GV. In clinical trials, a number of metrics are used to measure GV, many of which are not well understood in the clinical practice. Until a gold standard metric for GV is established, the variety of measurements available may confound the choice of an optimal treatment for an individual patient.

  3. 3
    top 1.8%

    Thiamine Deficiency: An Important Consideration in Critically Ill Patients

    Pradeep K. Attaluri, Austin Castillo, Hawa Edriss, KENNETH M. NUGENT

    143 citationsdoi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.06.015OpenAlex

  4. 4
    top 2.4%

    Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy on Patient Outcomes by Antibiotic Resistance Status From Serious Gram-negative Bacterial Infections

    Nicole Gidaya Bonine, Ariel Berger, Arman Altincatal, Rosa Wang, Tarun Bhagnani and 2 more

    142 citationsOpen access (CC-BY-NC-ND)doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.11.009OpenAlex

    Show abstract

    BACKGROUND: To examine the clinical and economic burdens associated with delayed receipt of appropriate therapy among patients with Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections, stratified by antibiotic resistance status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis using the Premier Hospital Database. Adult admissions (July 2011-September 2014) with evidence of complicated urinary tract infection, complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-associated pneumonia, or bloodstream infection, length of stay (LOS) ≥1 days and a positive GNB culture from a site consistent with infection type (culture draw date = index date) were identified and stratified by antibiotic susceptibility to index pathogens. Delayed appropriate therapy was defined as no receipt of antibiotic(s) with relevant microbiological activity on or within 2 days of index date. Inverse probability weighting and multivariate regression analyses were used to estimate the association between delayed appropriate therapy and outcomes. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate postindex duration of antibiotic therapy, LOS…

  5. 5
    top 3%

    The Properties of Cytokines in Multiple Sclerosis: Pros and Cons

    Kexin Wang, Feng Song, Alejandro Fernandez-Escobar, Gang Luo, Junhui Wang and 1 more

    119 citationsdoi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.08.018OpenAlex

  6. 8
    top 4.7%

    Antibiotic Timing and Outcomes in Sepsis

    Richard Kim, Alex M. Ng, Annuradha K. Persaud, Stephen P. Furmanek, Yash N. Kothari and 5 more

    68 citationsdoi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.02.007OpenAlex

  7. 9
    top 5.3%

    Gender Disparity in Authorship of Peer Reviewed Medical Publications

    Karla Bernardi, Nicole B. Lyons, Lillian Huang, Julie L. Holihan, Oscar A. Olavarria and 7 more

    66 citationsOpen accessdoi:10.1016/j.amjms.2019.11.005OpenAlex

How to read this list

The cohort is every article, review and book chapter OpenAlex attributes to The American Journal of the Medical Sciences with publication year 2018, excluding retracted works and paratext such as editorials and errata. The top 10 by citation count are listed; the percentile is the rank divided by the cohort size. 3 of the 10 entries have an abstract in OpenAlex. Counts were read on 29 October 2026 and will not be updated on this page, so a quoted rank stays verifiable. Full rules on the methodology page.

Other journals, same idea

Work with these 10 papers in Kahubi

  • The papers land in your library with their DOIs
  • Ask anything across all of them, with citations
  • Draft a literature review from the same sources

Free plan, no card. Your files stay private unless you share them.

Reading several of these?

Kahubi reads papers with you, keeps every citation traceable and drafts with sources you can check. Free plan, no card.