Kahubi vs Paperguide
Paperguide and Kahubi share an idea: researchers should not need five tools to get from a question to a paper. Both search the literature, help with reviews and support writing. The differences are in what else is included, where your data is processed and what the final document looks like.
What Paperguide does well
Credit where it's due: these are real strengths, and for some workflows they are exactly what you need.
- AI search across a large corpus of papers
- A literature review workflow with screening and reporting
- Chat with PDFs and structured data extraction
- A built-in reference manager and citation-grounded writer
Where Kahubi differs
Qualitative and quantitative methods included
Kahubi runs statistics on your CSV files (from t-tests to regression, PCA and Cronbach’s alpha) and handles interview studies end to end: EU transcription with speaker labels, AI-suggested codes you confirm, and themes linked back to the transcript.
Processed in the EU
Kahubi is operated by Avidemic AB in Sweden. AI processing, transcription and web search run with European providers, and your content is never used to train models. That matters when your data includes participants.
A compiled, versioned manuscript
Drafts are real LaTeX or rich-text documents that compile to PDF in one click, export to Word, and keep every version. There is also a Word add-in if your co-authors work in Word.
Your own voice
At signup Kahubi finds your published papers and learns a style profile from them, so drafts sound like you rather than a generic AI writer.
Feature comparison
| Capability | Paperguide | Kahubi |
|---|---|---|
| Chats with your full library | Yeschat with PDFs and a reference manager | Yesthe agent reads, searches, and cites your whole library |
| Edits a real LaTeX manuscript (compiled to PDF) | No | YesLaTeX → PDF compile built in, plus .docx and .tex export |
| Systematic review flow with PRISMA support | Yesliterature review workflow with screening | Yesdefine → search → screen → written review (PRISMA, MOOSE, Cochrane) |
| Statistics on your CSVs (t-tests, ANOVA, regression…) | No | Yesfrom t-tests to PCA and Cronbach’s alpha, results land in your draft |
| Interview transcription processed in the EU | No | Yesspeaker labels, 99+ languages, EU-based providers |
| Learns your writing voice from your papers | No | Yesa style profile learned from your own publications |
Last reviewed October 2026. Based on each product's public materials. Features change, so verify details on their site. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.
Choose Paperguide if…
You want an all-in-one literature tool and your work is mainly reviews and reading.
Choose Kahubi if…
Your study also involves data, interviews or focus groups, you need EU processing, or you want a compiled LaTeX or Word manuscript at the end.
Kahubi pricing
Simple monthly plans, cancel anytime. A real free tier to start with, and predictable monthly cost on every paid plan.
Try Kahubi on a small project
For a single ongoing study
For active researchers
For labs and heavy users
Kahubi vs Paperguide: common questions
What is the main difference between Paperguide and Kahubi?
Can I move my library from Paperguide to Kahubi?
Is there a free plan?
Try the Kahubi side of the comparison
Sign up free, import your library in minutes, and run one real task (a screening round, an analysis, a draft) before you decide.